Vikas Divyakirti, a prominent figure in the education sector and a former IAS officer, has stirred up controversy with his scathing critique of the upcoming Bollywood film “Animal,” starring Ranbir Kapoor. Divyakirti, who also had a special role in the film “12th Fail,” has voiced his disappointment with Kapoor’s latest project, labeling it as “Itni Fuhad Aur Badtameez Film.”
Background:
Vikas Divyakirti gained prominence in both the education sector and the bureaucratic circles for his contributions and achievements. His involvement in the film “12th Fail,” albeit in a special role, added another dimension to his public persona. With his background and reputation, his opinions carry weight, especially in matters concerning education and culture.
The Controversial Statement:
In a recent interview, Vikas Divyakirti did not mince words when expressing his views on Ranbir Kapoor’s upcoming film “Animal.” He described the film as “Itni Fuhad Aur Badtameez” (so frivolous and ill-mannered), indicating his disapproval of its content and themes. His statement has sparked discussions and debates within the film industry and among cinephiles.
Divyakirti’s Perspective:
Divyakirti’s criticism of “Animal” extends beyond mere disapproval of its content. As an educator and former civil servant, he appears to be concerned about the impact of such films on society, especially on impressionable minds. His statement reflects a broader discourse on the responsibility of the entertainment industry in shaping cultural norms and values.
Impact on the Industry:
Divyakirti’s critique comes at a crucial juncture for Bollywood, which has been grappling with questions of artistic freedom versus social responsibility. His stature and credibility add weight to the ongoing discussions about the kind of content being produced and consumed in Indian cinema. It remains to be seen how his remarks will influence the reception of “Animal” and future productions.
Response from the Film Industry:
The film industry has responded with a mix of curiosity and defensiveness to Divyakirti’s critique. While some filmmakers and actors have defended the creative freedom of artists, others have acknowledged the need for more nuanced portrayals in mainstream cinema. The controversy has reignited conversations about the balance between entertainment and social consciousness in Bollywood.
Ranbir Kapoor’s Reaction:
As the lead actor in “Animal,” Ranbir Kapoor’s response to Divyakirti’s criticism has been eagerly awaited. So far, Kapoor has refrained from directly addressing the issue but has emphasized the film’s entertainment value in various interviews. His silence on the matter has fueled speculation about his views on the role of cinema in shaping societal norms.
Public Reception:
The public reception to Divyakirti’s critique has been divided. While some have applauded his courage to speak out against what he perceives as problematic content, others have accused him of being out of touch with contemporary cinematic trends. The controversy has sparked heated debates on social media platforms, further highlighting the polarizing nature of the film industry.
Vikas Divyakirti’s criticism of Ranbir Kapoor’s “Animal” has brought to the forefront important discussions about the role of cinema in society. His stance reflects broader concerns about the cultural impact of mainstream entertainment and the responsibility of filmmakers and actors. As the controversy unfolds, it underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of the intersection between art, culture, and social values in contemporary India.
By – TAZEEN AKHTER