Amidst allegations of photo manipulation surrounding a portrait of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, the photographer responsible for capturing the moment comes forward to refute the claims and share the original image.
The Controversy Unfolds:
The black-and-white Valentine’s Day photograph of the Sussexes, depicting Meghan resting her head on Harry’s lap under a tree, sparked controversy when UK media accused it of being altered, specifically by adding a willow tree in the background.
Photographer’s Rebuttal:
In response to the allegations, the photographer, Misan Harriman, vehemently denies any manipulation and demands an apology from the media outlets that propagated the claims. He shares the original coloured version of the photograph, emphasizing that no editing was done to the image.
Setting the Record Straight:
Harriman clarifies that the portrait was captured as is, without any alterations to the scenery or background. He refutes the notion that a willow tree was added, stating that the tree in question is a Jacaranda tree.
Podcast Misinterpretation:
The photographer addresses a podcast episode where he was allegedly misconstrued as admitting to doctoring the image. He asserts that the discussion merely revolved around the circumstances of capturing the portrait during the lockdown and denies any admission of manipulation.
Clarifying the Exchange:
Harriman underscores that his comments about the couple being under a willow tree were taken out of context and were not indicative of editing the photograph. He deems the claim of photo manipulation as “insidious” and refutes its validity.
Maintaining Integrity:
Emphasizing the integrity of his work, Harriman reiterates that the only alteration made to the photograph was converting it to black-and-white. He dismisses the notion of tampering with the image and emphasizes the authenticity of the original portrait.
Royal Family’s Recent Controversy:
The scrutiny over the photograph adds to the recent controversies surrounding the royal family, particularly Kate Middleton’s admission of editing a palace-issued photograph. The heightened speculation on social media regarding her absence from public life further fueled the media frenzy.
Conclusion:
As the photographer stands by the authenticity of the portrait and refutes claims of editing, the controversy surrounding the photograph sheds light on the complexities of media scrutiny and the importance of maintaining transparency in the portrayal of public figures.
-Prisha Jaiswal