India has vehemently criticized the use of veto powers by certain nations to obstruct evidence-based terrorist listings at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). This obstruction, according to India’s Permanent Representative to the UN, Ruchira Kamboj, contradicts the council’s commitment to combat terrorism effectively.
China’s Veto and Concealed Obstruction:
In a thinly veiled criticism of China, India pointed out the opaque practices within certain UNSC subsidiary bodies, which prevent public disclosure of decisions rejecting listing requests. Last year, China placed a technical hold on a proposal to designate Sajid Mir, a key figure in the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks, as a global terrorist. This move effectively blocked the proposal, indicating a concealed veto.
Transparent Decision-Making Process:
India emphasized the need for transparency in selecting chairs of subsidiary bodies and distributing decision-making powers. Kamboj stressed the importance of an open and consultative process to ensure fairness and integrity.
Troop-Contributing Countries’ Concerns:
India, as a significant troop-contributing nation, called for the consideration of concerns raised by troop and police-contributing countries in implementing peacekeeping mandates. Furthermore, India advocated for the removal of outdated agenda items from the Security Council’s discussions to enhance efficiency.
UNSC Reform:
India reiterated its demand for comprehensive reform of the UNSC, urging nations blocking progress on this front to embrace genuine reform efforts. Kamboj emphasized the necessity of adapting the council to contemporary challenges and ensuring equitable representation, particularly for developing countries and underrepresented regions.
Holistic Approach to Working Methods:
Highlighting the interconnectedness of working methods with other aspects, Kamboj emphasized the importance of addressing issues comprehensively rather than adopting a piecemeal approach. She stressed the need for a Security Council that reflects the diverse realities of the modern world.
Relevance of Working Methods Debate:
Amid global crises in Ukraine and Gaza, the debate on the Security Council’s working methods remains crucial. Kamboj urged member states to reflect collectively on the council’s effectiveness in maintaining international peace and security, especially in light of past practices.
Enhanced Engagement with General Assembly:
India proposed meaningful engagement with the wider UN membership through discussions on the Security Council’s report in the General Assembly. Despite longstanding demands for analytical reporting, current practices merely provide factual data, without offering deeper insights into the council’s performance.
Conclusion:
India’s critique of China’s veto power usage underscores the urgent need for transparency and fairness in UNSC decision-making processes. By advocating for reforms and emphasizing the importance of equitable representation, India aims to strengthen the council’s effectiveness in addressing contemporary security challenges.
-Prisha Jaiswal