Op Sindoor: Did Political Orders Delay Air Victories Over Pakistani Targets?
India’s defence attache shared that initial political orders in Op Sindoor to hit only terror sites led to fighter jet losses. Once constraints lifted, IAF gained full air control. Mixed loss figures sparked debate, prompting calls in Parliament for clear answers on strategy.
Aryan K 
New Delhi [India] June 30: A navy officer, India’s defence attache to Indonesia, shared how Op Sindoor began with strict political orders to hit only terror infrastructure in Pakistan. This restriction led to the loss of some Indian fighter jets, as military targets remained untouched early on.
Change In Tactics
Initial constraints forbade attacks on Pakistani military bases or air defences, risking aircraft. The officer said once losses occurred, India shifted tactics. The IAF then focused on suppressing enemy air defences (SEAD/DEAD), regaining control and turning the battle in their favour.
Mixed Loss Reports
An Indonesian expert claimed India lost five jets, including Rafales, a MiG‑29 and Sukhoi‑30, plus a drone. The officer agreed some planes were indeed lost—but numbers varied. He stressed losses were tied directly to early restrictions, not pilot errors.
Official Pushback
India’s embassy in Jakarta responded, saying the officer’s comments were misrepresented. They emphasised that political oversight ensured civilian control, and Op Sindoor targeted terror setups only, keeping the move non‑escalatory and within diplomatic limits.
Parliament Seeks Clarity
Congress MP Jairam Ramesh demanded a special Parliament session to discuss aircraft losses and military decisions. He asked why PM Modi hasn’t briefed all parties. The officer’s insights followed previous comments by CDS General Chauhan on rapid correction after May 7 losses.
